Comments on: Give JavaScript 2 a Look

By: Katz Got Your Tongue? » method_missing in JavaScript?

Katz Got Your Tongue? » method_missing in JavaScript? — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:38:04 +0000

[...] posted previously about JavaScript 2 (also known as ECMAScript 4). Since I last discussed this topic, the debate over [...]

By: Phil

Phil — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:16:49 +0000

lemon: class-based programming has already infiltrated JS in the form of Prototype and other libraries. You can ignore it, but if you want to use it, there’s a unified way, which helps avoid inter-library balkanization.

What it reminds me of is Common Lisp: you get dynamicity by default, but if you want it to be stricter/more performant, you can lock down code by adding types etc.

By: ECMAScript 4 или JavaScript 2, неужели рассвет в стране веб-программистов!? | Alpha-Beta-Release Blog

Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:02:52 +0000

[...] Give JavaScript 2 a Look [...]

By: napyfab:blog» Blog Archive » links for 2007-11-02

napyfab:blog» Blog Archive » links for 2007-11-02 — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:31:29 +0000

[...] Katz Got Your Tongue? » Give JavaScript 2 a Look (tags: javascript ecmascript tutorial feature example web development programming) [...]

By: Michael Sync

Michael Sync — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:09:36 +0000

seems like Mozilla is gonna add a lot of cool features in new version of Javascript..
What about IE-team? Are they gonna implement the same features to IE?? otherwise, we, js developer, are gonna face too much problem…

By: lemon

lemon — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:12:18 +0000

I don’t know how I feel about adding classes. Is that really necessary in a prototype based language?

Don’t mind the parameter typing, not when it’s optional anyway.

At least it’s not as bad as the Actionscript….3? 4? I can’t keep track :D

By: Dr Nic

Dr Nic — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:30:33 +0000

Hmm, its all looking very Java-ish to me (finals, parameter typing etc).